I have discussed two articles from the web site , one with 9 questions, the other on mumps. There are, I think, 18 web pages of articles about vaccines on that web site. I am uncertain as to the true number of pages of information as the navigation buttons at the bottom of the pages do not always seem to function correctly. That such a problem exists suggests that no one has bothered, like me, to go through the web site to read all the essays. Or maybe it is me and the price of using the Chrome browser. Anyway, there are a large collection of essays that serves as a rich vein of iron pyrite to mine for topics. At about 5 entries to a page, evaluating at a pace of about one monthly, it would take years to analyze all the misinformation on Medical Voices.
It occurs to me that at the center of each article is a nut of misinformation (or sometimes as many as nine) that serves as the core fallacy of that article. I want to emphasize that I am using ‘nut’ as a metaphor for seed, not in its other, more colloquial, meaning. So rather than an in-depth evaluation of each article (although some will warrant a future, more through review), I thought it would be interesting to identify the nut in each article and why it is wrong. So, in the spirit, but not the intellectual rigor, of ‘s “14 Studies“, let’s sort through the nuts …
1. , by Joseph Mercola, DO.
Less about misinformation and more a nut of fear-mongering. One of the ongoing problems with the flu vaccine is the lag between the (hopefully correct) identification of the year’s influenza strain and the production of the vaccine, taking about 9 months to come to fruition. Each dose of the flu vaccine is grown in a chicken egg, so the infrastructure required to produce all those eggs and support that one poor chicken is huge. What has been needed for years is a rapid, simple, and inexpensive method to generate huge amounts of flu antigen. Genetic engineering has made the production of human insulin in bacteria routine, to the benefit of every insulin-requiring diabetic. The benefit of introducing viral genes (but not the whole virus) into plants could be the ability to generate cheap vaccines. The other benefit is that plant infections cannot infect humans, making the vaccine theoretically safer than vaccines grown in mammalian cells.
As Mercola sums up:
Keep in mind that if you place your sole trust in your health officials and the vaccine makers, the potential price you might pay is your physical health and financial future. Everything is at stake. In my opinion, blindly believing that a plant-based vaccine will remove the possibility of viral contamination and potentially deadly side effects is foolhardy at best.
Fortunately, vaccine producers test for viruses and other contamination, so we do not have to rely on blind belief. He then lists a number of alternative flu treatments and preventatives that ever-so kindly link to Mercola.com where you can ever-so conveniently purchase his products, many of which do require blind belief for efficacy. And I am the big pharma shill.
2. , by Suzanne Humphries, MD.
The nut? Doctors are profit-driven tools of big pharma and the government.
The creativity of the Caring Profession has been systematically choked to death by the pharmaceutical industry, the AMA and the government who have been waltzing together for over 60 years….Young, bright college grads do not go to medical school with any understanding that the system they are embarking upon destroys health rather than cures it. They are about to become pawns in a system set up for commerce, with humans being the means of putting the check in the bank.
Dr. Humphries knows natural treatments are being suppressed since they cure the patient and, if cured, the patient no longer needs a doctor, eradicating the income of the medical-industrial complex. I presume, of the above were true, her practice is like that of an infectious disease doctor with no long term patients, because I cure the majority of my patients.
Removing heavy metals from the body is considered a risky and potentially dangerous intervention that is shunned and avoided by mainstream medicine, even though it has been done safely for over 30 years by alternative practitioners. This is an interesting paradox since many of the diseases that doctors treat are related in some way to heavy metal toxicity: hypertension, heart disease, various neurological diseases, cancer, and kidney failure. Could it be that addressing the cause would eliminate the need for the cure…and for the doctor?
Heavy metals? I thought all cancers were due to liver parasite. Could it be that heavy metals are related to none of diseases mentioned and the reason doctors ignore heavy metal is that they are not an etiology of disease and/or doctors prefer light jazz?
The suppression of truth for financial or other reasons is a popular refrain in the alt-med community. I have no understanding of this bizarro outlook on the medical community as I am not sympathetic to conspiracy theories. I work in an environment where everyone is doing their best to make people better and to prevent illness. Since many of the alt med practitioners seem to profit directly from selling the products that cure the alleged illnesses they diagnose, it is another example of ‘holy kettle calling the pot black, Batman.’ I sure wish I could make a buck off the diagnostics and therapeutic interventions I recommend.
3. , by Robert Sears, MD.
The nut? The CDC is covering up information about parents vaccinating children.
“I believe the CDC has been trying to hide the fact that more and more parents are refusing or delaying vaccines.”
That is often the standard of proof at Medical Voices. I believe. It is often a reference-free site. This is more conspiracy fear-mongering. I believe the CDC is doing no such thing. So who are you going to believe? Me or your lying eyes?
The proof? None. I have spent time discussing and reading about declining vaccine rates as part of my job in infection control and the source of my information is more often than not the CDC. If they are hiding this information, they are doing a lousy job.
4. , by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD
The nut? What follows is not parody, but a direct quote.
Peter Duesberg and Andrew Wakefield are two tenacious, brave men. They struggle against the medical-government-pharmaceutical complex’s efforts to disenfranchise them, and they have to endure a withering barrage of ad hominem attacks. But they do not flinch in their efforts to see truth reign, Duesberg with AIDS and Wakefield with vaccines.
One hopes that in the not too distant future both of these truths will pass through Schopenhauer’s third stage and become accepted as self-evident. Once fully accepted the pandemic of autism spectrum disorders and the chronic diseases that now afflict so many children – asthma, allergies, arthritis, enterocolitis, and diabetes – will abate; and AIDS by prescription, AIDS caused by taking anti-retroviral drugs that doctors prescribe to HIV-positive people – DNA chain terminators, like AZT, and protease inhibitors – will cease. The day will come when the CDC withdraws its childhood immunization schedule and stops recommending that vaccines be given to children under two years of age. HIV tests will no longer be done and anti-retroviral drugs will be outlawed.
Dr. Miller knows the truth; the rest of us are deluded. Unfortunately, Wakefield lied and Duesberg is wrong.
There are almost 300,000 articles on HIV or AIDS on Pubmed, representing probably a million authors, demonstrating remarkably sophisticated understanding about both the biology of HIV and its complications. To think, maybe a million HIV researchers and physicians all working together to keep Peter Duesbergs truth suppressed. My career started with the HIV epidemic (association is not causation) and I have watched the evolution of our understanding of the disease and its treatment. We have gone from a 9-month life expectancy to an almost normal life span thanks to HIV medications.
To suggest HIV is not a cause of AIDS but that “the real cause of AIDS is four-fold: heavy-duty recreational drug use, anti-retroviral drugs, receptive anal intercourse, and malnutrition” is an interesting interpretation of the medical literature. I am glad Dr. Miller is a heart surgeon and especially glad he will not be mine. Again, I keep thinking of DC comics’ Bizarro World, where everyone on the square planet Htrae does the opposite of what is done on the real Earth. Many of the Medical Voices essays could have been written on Htrae.
The trials and tribulations of Dr. Wakefield have been well covered on this blog. I would wonder if, rather than a measles/autism researcher, it had been Dr. Millers financial adviser who exhibited the same behaviors. Invented information for investing and bought Enron. Would he be so understanding when he lost his 401k, calling his adviser a tenacious, brave man struggling against the banking-government-investment complex’s?
5. , by Jaquelyn McCandless, M.D
The nut on this tree is that heavy metals and vaccines, especially the MMR, are the trigger of autism and that oral chelation will reverse autism. Dr. McCandles is a practitioner of said chelation therapy. Is it me, or do expect to see a paper suggesting the benefits of the Sham Wow or the Slap Chop?
To date there are no studies confirming an association between vaccines in general and the MMR or mercury in particular, as a cause of autism. Two recent studies suggest that getting the vaccines as recommended may be protective for autism and neurological function. Of course, it is not the data that counts at Medical Voices.
6. , by Jennifer Craig, BSN, MA, Ph.D
The first two thirds of this entry is a recounting of the early history of the smallpox vaccine. It is an entertaining read, but not being a historian I cannot vouchsafe the information. The author does not bother to note that the vaccinations of Jenner’s time, transfer of pus, is not the same as modern vaccine production techniques. Then it gets weird.
There has been no human small pox in the world since 1976 (). There are many pox viruses, a family of related viruses that preferentially infect different hosts. There is cow pox and monkey pox and squirrel pox. The cow pox was used in the vaccine to eradicate smallpox because there is enough similarity between the two viruses that infection with cow pox prevents infection with small pox, but there is enough difference that it is very rare for the cow pox to spread beyond the inoculation site.
The fact there has been no small pox since 1976 is, it would seem, reasonably good evidence that there is no longer human small pox in the world and that vaccination was the cause of its eradication. However, Dr. Craig has a clever solution. Her nut? Small pox is still around but has been renamed as either chicken pox or monkey pox. Really. The essays on Medical Voices induce a need to qualify that the quotes from the site are the real deal and are not meant as a joke on my part.
It is akin to saying that the dodo is not extinct, it has been renamed the chicken or turkey; after all, they are all flightless birds.
7. , by William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.
The nut: the H1N1 flu epidemic was faked by the WHO to sell drugs and vaccines. This article was published in Feb 2010, and the idea has had a resurgence this month thanks to the
Everyone in Infectious Diseases learns about the pandemic of 1918–1919 which killed maybe 40 million people world-wide and 600,000 in the US. We worry that one day a new strain of flu will emerge with the right combination of virulence factors and there will be a repeat of 1918. Luckily, we dodged that bullet with the in 2009-2010. The H1N1 was highly infectious, but not very virulent: 61 million infected, 274,000 hospitalizations and 12,000 deaths by CDC estimates. Deaths, like the 1918 pandemic, predominated in the young and the pregnant.
I always like the way anti-vaccine proponents belittle the mortality and morbidity of vaccine-preventable illnesses: “I’m sure by now you’ve noticed that swine flu is nothing more than a sniffle.” For a short time in my hospitals, just as the flu peaked, we were maxed out. No beds, no vents, and a worry about how we were going to find the staff and space to treat patients if the increase in flu related admissions continued and then, poof, the rates fell instead of increased. I have never leaned so far over the edge of the precipice before and been pulled back from what appeared to be a disaster. It still amazes me, months later. I saw at two flu related deaths; H1N1 was more than a sniffle for some. 162 million doses of vaccine were produced and distributed, but only 90 million were given. So if 60 million cases of flu were prevented from the 90 million shots given, the vaccine could have saved 12,000 lives.
People in public health are always screwed: they will either under-prepare or over-prepare for a disaster, and they get blamed either way. They didn’t do enough and people died, or they did too much and wasted money. The solution? Let’s fill the WHO and the CDC with psychics. Miss Cleo should have been called for her free readin’ now.
8. , by Russell Blaylock, MD.
There is the philosophical/political question as to whether the government has the right to force vaccinations; it is not a scientific question. The questions of safely and efficacy are answerable by science. Part of this essay is philosophical, and Dr. Blaylock evidently blames vaccination policy on, well, I feel odd saying this as it seems so, well, weird, but he blames, er,……..the Rockefellers, for vaccinations in the US. Yes. Really. The Rockefellers:
The Rockefellers either owned outright or had controlling interest in all of the major pharmaceutical companies. This has given them absolute and extremely powerful access to the reins of power at all levels. Yet, they can be defeated by the truth.
So last century. Could we at least have the suggestion of a modern conspiracy, like Reptilians, because I, for one, bow down to my lizard overlords. I did find some web sites to suggest that the Rockefellers are high order Reptilians, so I can not dismiss this argument out of hand. Repeat after me. In the context of this essay, nut is metaphorically referring to “.”
As to the science, his major contention is that herd immunity is a myth, and proceeds to make a series of calculations to prove that herd immunity is a myth. He combines all vaccines, each with different efficacies, as if they all have the same efficacy. There are several characteristics of anti-science/anti-vaccine writers: they do not like change, they do not like subtlety, and they like topics to be all or nothing.
His basic argument is that vaccine response has been discovered to fade with time. Also, I might add, water is wet and fire is hot. Since we do not have outbreaks of vaccine preventable illnesses in the population who have faded immunity, herd immunity is a myth.
He fails to take into account that fading antibody levels does necessarily not mean fading ability to respond to infection, since many who have been vaccinated will have an amnestic response and gear up antibody production after re-exposure to infection. There is also behavior, nutrition, hygiene and understanding of disease that has helped decrease spread of illness compared to the outbreaks. But like most anti-vaccinators (I so need a better term, term…. vaccinators…terminators? Been done and is probably copyrighted), either the vaccines are 100% or they are nothing.
Like many anti-vaxers, he fails to understand, or chooses not to consider, subtlety and nuance. Part of vaccination results in vector control. For example, vaccination of children with the conjugated pneumococcal vaccine has lead to a marked decrease in invasive pneumococcus in the adult and elderly population. So targeting disease in one population can prevent disease in another, non-immune, population. However, waning immunity is an issue with pertussis, and the reservoir for disease in children is vaccinated adults whose immunity has faded (but there is sufficient immunity to prevent whooping cough). Reality is always more complicated than the fantasy world of anti-vaxers.
The rest of his argument?
The fact that powerful, enormously wealthy foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller series of foundations, are supporting forced vaccination greatly enhances the power of governments all over the World.
The big irony from my perspective is the an importnat issue with vaccines is the ease with which people can get an exemption. I looked for statements from the above foundations to see if I would find recommendations for “forced” vaccinations. All I found were the statements of Dr. Blaylock, but of course, that is what the Gates and the Fords and the Rockefellers want me to write.
They are out to get us. I know this kind of argument appeals to some, but I don’t get it. It seems so fringe it should be on a surrey. Watch that fringe and see how it flutters.
9. , by S. Humphries, MD .
The basic nut here is that vaccinations are given routinely in the hospital to patients without a doctor’s specific order. That is true in many hospitals; I have been a big proponent for those policies in my institutions at the behest of my Lizard/Rockefeller masters.
Part of quality indicators is to make sure that all patients have both the flu vaccine and the pneumococcal vaccine. The secret to quality care, I have discovered over the years, is take responsibility out of the hands of the physician, since more often than not, in a busy day, they may forget. It is only after we have taken the responsibility out the hands of physicians, who are focused on the acute problems, that compliance with numerous routine quality initiatives improved with a subsequent marked decline in infections and mortality in my hospitals.
Dr. Humphries says:
You are not in control anymore. Your patients can be harmed by vaccines that you have not ordered — while your back is turned.
As I read the article, while this policy had been in place since 2007, she discovered the policy in 2010. Evidently while her back was turned she was paying no attention to what was going on in her hospital. She continues:
Guidelines, recommendations and one-size-fits-all treatment programs of all comers for the sake of profit are the real driving forces.
It is not mentioned, and I can only speak for infectious disease guidelines, that in virtually every study published on outcomes, populations who receive the guidelines, recommendations and one-size-fits-all treatment programs have decreased mortality and morbidity compared to populations where the treating doc does what they want. That is the beauty of science-based medicine. Patients do better when their physician follows the guidelines. Of course, I do not suffer from the hubris and arrogance that the Doctor is the be-all and end-all in patient care. I consider the practice of medicine to be a team undertaking.
10. ? Harold Buttram, MD
Shaken baby syndrome is where a baby is shaken violently shaken causing retinal hemorrhages, fractures, soft tissue injuries and/or subdural hematoma from a whip lash injury. The nut of his thesis is all these effects are from vaccines not trauma. At least he didn’t suggest it was caused by the Rockefellers, not necessarily an improvement in critical thinking.
Bleeding in the brain. Trauma? No. How could trauma cause bleeding? It must be a vaccine. This is perhaps the oddest argument in a site filled with odd and speaks for itself. It is nice that those who injure children have an advocate.
The Visions statement of the website:
International Medical Council on Vaccination will become the most comprehensive educational center on the Internet for physicians seeking the truth about vaccines. This will change healthcare as we know it.
I will not disagree. If baby shakers get off by blaming vaccines, it will be not be change, but not a good one.
11. by Lynette Volkers, RN, BSN
The nut here: vaccines do not do anything and are filled with toxins. I bet half of the essays are variations on this theme. She states flu only kills a 1000 people year (the direct deaths) not 30,000 (indirect deaths), they have formaldehyde (not mentioning that you make an ounce and a half a day with normal metabolism and the vaccines have less than 0.1 mg. Nothing new here.
But Ms. Volker is not noted for her ability to read. She says “manufacturer’s package insert indicate that the flu shot should NOT be given to pregnant women.”
They do? Let us find a package insert.
Monovalent Vaccine or Fluzone vaccine. It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.
Reproduction studies have been performed in female rabbits at a dose approximately 15 times the human dose (on a mg/kg basis) and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to AGRIFLU. There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, AGRIFLU should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. In two reproduction toxicity studies, the effect of AGRIFLU on embryo-fetal or post-natal development was evaluated in pregnant rabbits. Animals were administered AGRIFLU 3 times prior to gestation, during the period of organogenesis (gestation day 7) and later in pregnancy (gestation day 20), 0.5 mL/rabbit/occasion (approximately 15-fold excess relative to the projected human dose on a body weight basis) by intramuscular injection. Effects on post-natal development could not be fully evaluated, however, there were no adverse effects attributable to the vaccine on mating, female fertility, pregnancy, or embryo-fetal development. There were no vaccine related fetal malformations or other evidence of teratogenesis noted in this study.
I do not see a ‘NOT’ in any of the package inserts, just the usual cautions. That pregnant women are more likely to die from flu does not seem to be a concern nor is checking her statements for accuracy. I don’t know. I get the sense that the only way the writers on this blog can make an argument is to ignore pertinent information, make up information, or misrepresent information.
12. by Sue McIntosh, MD
The nut is:
recommending more and more toxic vaccines and belittling arguments against vaccination. Such behavior can only occur when profit, creation of illness rather than health, and population control (including the medical profession) are priorities.
Population control? If you want population control, then getting rid of vaccines would be the better approach. Dead people, after all, do not reproduce (zombies notwithstanding).
I recommend vaccines because they are safe and efficacious. Vaccines have been the single best bang for the buck, decreasing morbidity and mortality with surprisingly few side effects. But I bet Dr. McIntosh doesn’t use airbags, since they kill maybe 25 people a year, probably do not save lives and are in cars only to generate profit for big auto. And don’t get me started on seat belts.
13. , by Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Dr. Tenpenny is a germ denier. Disease is due to toxins that damage the body and the germs subsequently take advantage of the toxin-damaged tissues. She even quotes the that Pasteur recanted his germ theory on his death bed. Again, fact-checking is not the strong point of the Medical Voices website or its authors.
The nut that follows is a direct quote. I am afraid that someone will think I am making this up as an attempt at parody, so please do look it up yourself.
It may be that the role of both the bacteria and the virus is to induce an inflammatory response, a low-level and modified cytokine storm, to help the body to detoxify. It would be very interesting to test the secretions that are expelled during a bout of the flu for chemicals and heavy metals. For example, if a person reportedly died from “viral pneumonia,” perhaps the body was trying to expel a huge amount of chemical-containing mucous. If the person’s immune system was too weak to muster an adequate response or his lymphatics were too congested to drain the accumulated debris—and more chemicals are added during the acute episode, such as aspirin, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and steroids—the body may have become overwhelmed, leading to the person’s demise.
In the presence of faulty detoxification processes, toxic overload occurs. Maybe microbes are handy to have around, inflaming the system and cleaning out the muck. If everything on this planet is here for a reason and there are no mistakes, perhaps an episode of the flu, with the increased mucous, cough, nasal drainage, and diarrhea is the act of cleaning out the internal dross.
Supporting the body through this elimination process with homeopathy, herbs, and Chinese medicine – instead of suppressing the symptoms with Western medicine’s tools – may be the key to long-term health and longevity. From this perspective, instead of being the problem, viruses may be part of the solution, the “clean-up crew. ”It should be noted that the human race evolved because of its relationship to microbes, not in spite of it.
What a novel thought! Instead of fearing the flu and doing everything possible to avoid it — including spending billions of dollars to create an experimental vaccine — it may be okay to spend a week or two in bed, clearing out accumulated toxicities. I’m sure many will think of this heresy bordering on the ridiculous.
It is not heresy: it is ridiculous, bordering on ludicrous, down the street from preposterous, kitty-corner from farcical, and across the street from absurd.
The home page has the phrase “Medical doctors convey the results of thousands of hours of study.” I am not certain what they are studying, given that many of the entries do not have references. But the information above is not based on references found in Pubmed, except, of course, on Bizarro World.
14. , by Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Dr. Tenpenny musters data to suggest the pregnant women should not get the flu vaccine. Left out in her data was mortality.
In the death in pregnant females was high:
Although appropriate nonpregnant control groups were generally not available, mortality rates among pregnant women in the pandemics of 1918 and 1957 appeared to be abnormally high. Among 1,350 reported cases of influenza among pregnant women during the pandemic of 1918, the proportion of deaths was reported to be 27%. Similarly, among a small case series of 86 pregnant women hospitalized in Chicago for influenza in 1918, 45% died (6). Among pregnancy-associated deaths in Minnesota during the 1957 pandemic, influenza was the leading cause of death, accounting for nearly 20% of deaths associated with pregnancy during the pandemic period; half of women of reproductive age who died were pregnant.
We do better in the modern era right? .
In all, 18 pregnant women and 4 postpartum women (total, 22 of 102 [22%]) required intensive care, and 8 (8%) died. Six deliveries occurred in the ICU, including four emergency cesarean deliveries. The 2009 H1N1 influenza–specific maternal mortality ratio (the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births) was 4.3.
Complications and deaths for vaccine-preventable illnesses are relatively rare in a large population. Dr. Sears, at the end of his The Vaccine Book, says something to the effect that he is glad he has never cared for cases of the rare morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases that his ID colleagues contend with, else he might be more in favor of vaccines. That is another characteristic of anti-vaxers. If they haven’t seen a death or complication, then the morbidity and mortality of an illness doesn’t matter or exist. About 30,000 die each year in car accidents or from being shot. I have never had a personal acquaintance with either, yet I wear a seat belt, do not own a gun, and my kids are vaccinated.
15. , by Richard Moskowitz, MD
His nut: the diseases are not that bad and if they occur they should be treated with homeopathic nostrums. Again, a dismissal of the suffering and death because it is uncommon.
He even goes so far as to suggest that:
Likewise, any child whose sibling or parent previously contracted poliomyelitis, or a severe or complicated case of measles or whooping cough or any of the other diseases listed, should not receive the vaccine prepared against that illness.
Given that many severe reactions to infections may be the result of various polymorphisms in the immune system that result in a genetic predisposition to severe illness, if a sibling had a bad course of illness, then it may be all the more important to prevent it in the unaffected sibling.
I have seen tetanus, a nasty disease. He recommends:
Hypericum can reputedly treat as well as prevent tetanus, but I would recommend giving human antitoxin at the first sign of the disease, since it is far less effective later on.
I do not know whether to laugh or to cry.
I am at 15 blog entries. Can I keep going? Not a single reasonable reality-based essay yet. What is next. Mercola? Argh.
16. , by Joseph Mercola, DO
The nut here: the flu isn’t that bad, the vaccine doesn’t work, and all you need is vitamin D. Influenza caused “just 1,100 actual flu deaths.” Another just. They do not seem to care that people die. I have discussed flu mortality at length on this blog.
I am not going to argue against the importance of Vitamin D as an immune modulator and the importance of being replete in vitamin D to help decrease chance of illness. But note the absolutes: vaccines do nothing, vitamin D is all. In my world, both vaccines and vitamin D help, to variable degrees.
17. , by Russell Blaylock, MD
The nut of oversimplification.
The flu virus is supposed to cause a “cytokine storm,” and this inflammatory overreaction is what causes the damage, not the virus itself. This is interesting because all vaccines also cause a cytokine storm, one that can last for decades. This is why vaccines are linked to sudden death, joint pains, depression, weakness and fatigue, mental cloudiness, seizures, neurological disorders, and autoimmune diseases. (No one seems to be concerned about vaccine-caused cytokine storms, which are, in fact, immunoexcitotoxicity.)
No. Sorry. Wrong. “Cytokine storm” refers to the massive release of cytokines that accompanies an overwhelming and often rapidly fatal disease. It is a hurricane. Vaccines are, in comparison, a light spring shower that is comes right after you have sown the grass seed. Cytokine storm: I do not think it means what you think it means.
There is zero evidence that vaccines cause a cytokine storm, much less a storm that lasts for years. Where do they get these ideas? Studying thousands of hours of what?
18. , by Joseph Mercola, DO
Nigeria has also been facing outbreaks of polio that are caused by the polio vaccine itself! The nation has faced at least seven separate polio outbreaks caused by a mutated polio virus from the polio vaccine.
That is true, but he leaves out key information. What a surprise. Someone who is against vaccines leaves out important information. What happened in Northern Nigeria is they were on the verge of eradicating polio when Islamic clerics decided that the vaccine was being used to spread HIV and sterility in Nigerian Muslims. The clerics told all Muslims to stop the taking the polio vaccine. The live polio virus is used because it results in a superior response compared to the killed vaccine, although it rarely can cause polio. Also Africa has many immunoincompetent children from HIV and malnutrition and a poor sewer system. This not-so-perfect storm allowed the polio vaccine strain to persist in the environment and mutate, and as it mutated it became more virulent, causing polio. The number of cases from wild polio has dwarfed the vaccine-related disease. As the vaccine compliance has increased, the number of cases of wild type and vaccine derived polio has decreased.
But you would not know the rest of the story from reading Mercola. It is a shame that Paul Harvey has passed on. Medical Voices needs an editor.
In the past 10 years worldwide over 10 billion doses of OPV have been administered to more than 2 billion children; 9 cVDPV (vaccine derived polio virus) outbreaks have occurred in 9 countries, in communities with low OPV coverage, resulting in under 200 polio cases; during that period, more than 33,000 children were paralyzed by wild poliovirus while over 3.5 million polio cases were prevented by OPV. cVDPVs in the past have been rapidly stopped with 2-3 rounds of high-quality immunization campaigns with OPV.
Of course Dr. Mercola has the answer to polio.
According to one such study, a substance produced during the sugar refining process, such as deoxysugars, may be responsible for polio. Even if the polio virus is present in a population, you’re not likely to get it unless you consume large quantities of refined sugar.
Yes, of course, the developing world, where paralytic polio is not uncommon, is noted for its large consumption of refined sugar. According to the WHO, Nigeria consumes 9.5 kg per person of refined sugar a year, compared to 31 kg for the US. That explains why the US has had so many polio outbreaks this century.
19. , by Victor A. Marcial Vega.
The one essay for which I have no comment since I do not read Spanish. There is one English sentence in the whole article: “Use an all natural antibiotic for viruses such as colloidal silver.” I tell my kids that you can judge a man by the company he keeps, so let’s say I am not optimistic about the veracity of this essay.
20. . Kristine M. Severyn, RPh, PhD
Of course the real reason that docs push vaccines is they make money.
Vaccines represent an economic boon for pediatricians. Profitable well-baby visits are timed to coincide with vaccination schedules established by the AAP and the CDC.
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 5:S472-91. PMID 19948579.
Net financial gain or loss from vaccination in pediatric medical practice
OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the net return (gain or loss after costs were subtracted from revenues) to private pediatric medical practices from investing time and resources in vaccines and vaccination of their patients.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of private medical practices requested data on all financial and capacity aspects of the practices, including operating expenses; labor composition and wages/salaries; private- and public-purchase vaccine orders and inventories; Medicaid and private insurance reimbursements; patient population; numbers of providers; and numbers, types, and lengths of visits. Costs were assigned to vaccination visits and subtracted from reimbursements from public- and private-pay sources to determine net financial gains/losses from vaccination.
RESULTS: Thirty-four practices responded to the survey. More than one half of the respondents broke even or suffered financial losses from vaccinating patients. With greater proportions of Medicaid-enrolled patients served, greater financial loss was noted. On average, private insurance vaccine administration reimbursements did not cover administration costs unless a child received > or = 3 doses of vaccine in 1 visit. Finally, wide ranges of per-dose prices paid and reimbursements received for vaccines indicated that some practices might be losing money in purchasing and delivering vaccines for private-pay patients if they pay high purchase prices but receive low reimbursements.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the vaccination portion of the business model for primary care pediatric practices that serve private-pay patients results in little or no profit from vaccine delivery. When losses from vaccinating publicly insured children are included, most practices lose money.
I am at twenty essays and have grown weary with the contents of Medical Voices. 19.1 essays of half-truths and misinformation. But, in the spirit of openness, I will say that the Rockefellers paid me to say that. I had naively thought I could evaluate the whole website, but it was too tough a nut to crack for one entry. There are more, many more, essays to evaluate. I will get to them in a later post.